Somatic embryogenesis and optimization of regeneration system from immature embryos in maize inbred lines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25081/rib.2022.v13.7490Keywords:
Maize, immature embryos, callus, Somatic embryogenesis, regeneration protocolAbstract
Maize production and productivity is on a sharp decline due to abiotic and abiotic stresses, therefore, an efficient regeneration protocol is an important tool that can contribute to maize improvement and gene-function studies to improve food security for the ever-growing population. The objective of this study was to optimize a regeneration system for CML 444 inbred line with CML 442 maize inbred line used as a reference. Callus was generated by incubation of immature embryos in Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium with vitamins supplemented with 0 - 4 g L-1 of 2, 4-D hormones, 900 mg L-1 proline, 250 mg L-1casein hydrolysate and 10 mg L-1 of filter sterilized AgNO3, 30 g L-l of sucrose and 3 g L-1 gelrite. Somatic embryo maturation was achieved by transferring 6-week old callus to MS medium with vitamins prepared as previously in callus induction with 60 g L-1 of sucrose and zero plant growth regulators (PGR). Shoot initiation was conducted in MS medium with vitamins supplemented with BAP, NAA at varied concentrations and a 0 mg L-1 control. Plants at a 3-leaf stage that had not rooted were transferred to MS media with vitamins with IBA at a concentration of 0 - 0.3 mg L–l. The 2, 4-D rates were significantly (p≤0.001) different for callus onset and callus induction. The genotype × rate interaction effects showed that 0 and 2 g L-1 2, 4-D had the lowest and highest mean, respectively in both lines during onset and induction of callus. The lines had significant (p≤0.001) effects on shooting induction, however, their means were not significantly different. Similarly, the means for the hormones were not significantly different for shooting induction. The lines, IBA rate and their interaction were significantly (p≤0.05) different for rooting induction. The means for the lines were significantly different for rooting induction in different IBA rates. Conversely, the mean for the IBA rates was significantly different for rooting induction. This study found that plant growth regulators rates during the callus induction stage play a key role during regeneration. This protocol was a success and could provide a fundamental platform for future transformation in this line.
Downloads
References
Abebe, D. Z., Teffera, W., & Machuka, J. S. (2008). Regeneration of tropical maize lines (Zea mays L.) from mature zygotic embryo through callus initiation. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(13), 2181-2186.
Ahmadabadi, M., Ruf, S., & Bock, R. (2007) A leaf-based regeneration and transformation system for maize (Zea mays L.). Transgenic Research, 16(4), 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-006-9046-y
Ali, F., Ahsan, M., Saeed, N. A., Ahmed, M., Ali, Q., Kanwal, N., Tehseen, M. M., Ijaz, U., Bibi, I., & Niazi, N. K. (2014). Establishment and optimization of callus-to-plant regeneration system using mature and immature embryos of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 16(1), 111-117.
Anami, S. E., Mgutu, A. J., Taracha, C., Coussens, G., Karimi, M., Hilson, P., Lijsebettens, M. V., & Machuka, J. (2010). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of tropical maize genotypes. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 102(3), 285-295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-010-9731-7
Armstrong, C. L., & Green, C. E. (1985). Establishment and maintenance of friable, embryogenic maize callus and the involvement of L-proline. Planta, 164(2), 207-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00396083
Bi, R. M., Kou, M., Mao, S. R., & Wang, H. G. (2007). Plant regeneration through callus initiation from mature embryo of Triticum. Plant Breeding, 126(1), 9-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01327.x
Binott, J. J., Songa, J. M., Ininda, J., Njagi, E. M., & Machuka, J. (2008). Plant regeneration from immature embryos of Kenyan maize in bread lines and their respective single cross hybrids through somatic embryogenic. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7(8), 981-987.
Bohorova, N., Fenell, S., McLean, S. Pellegrineschi, A., & Hoisington, D. (1999). Laboratory Protocols: CIMMYT Applied Genetic Engineering Laboratory. Mexico: CIMMYT
Brugière, N., Jiao, S., Hantke, S., Zinselmeier, C., Roessler, J. A., Niu, X., & Habben, J. E. (2003). Cytokinin oxidase gene expression in maize is localized to the vasculature, and is induced by cytokinins, abscisic acid, and abiotic stress. Plant Physiology, 132(3), 1228-1240. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.017707
Che, P., Lall, S., Nettleton, D., & Howell, S. H. (2006a). Gene expression programs during shoot, root, and callus development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Plant Physiology, 141(2), 620-637. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.081240
Che, P., Love, T. M., Frame, B. R., Wang, K., Carriquiry, A. L. & Howell, S. H. (2006b). Gene expression patterns during somatic embryo development and germination in maize Hi II callus cultures. Plant Molecular Biology, 62(1-2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-006-9013-2
Chen, J., Xu, W., Velten, J., Xin, Z., & Stout, J. (2012). Characterization of maize inbred lines for drought and heat tolerance. Journal Soil Water Conservation, 67(5), 354–364. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.354
Egertsdotter, U., Ahmad, I., & Clapham, D. (2019). Automation and scale up of somatic embryogenesis for commercial plant production, with emphasis on conifers. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10, 109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00109
Gao, Y., Zhao, M., Wu, X. H., Li, D., Borthakur, D., Ye, J. H., & Lu, J. L. (2019). Analysis of differentially expressed genes in tissues of Camellia sinensis during dedifferentiation and root redifferentiation. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39264-5
Gianazza, E., De ponti, P., Scienza, A., Villa, P., & Martinelli, L. (1992). Monitoring by two‐ dimensional electrophoresis somatic embryogenesis in leaf and petiole explants from Vitis. Electrophoresis, 13(4), 203‐209. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150130142
Grando, M. F., Varnier, M. L., Silva, M. R. D., Emydio, B. M., Pereira, L. R., & Suzin, M. (2013). Immature tassels as alternative explants in somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in south Brazilian maize genotypes. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy, 35(1), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v35i1.15545
Hodges, T., Kamo, K. K., Imbrie, C. W., & Becwar, M. R. (1986). Genotype specificity of somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in maize. Bio/Technology, 4(3), 219-223. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0386-219
Holderbaum, D. F., Traavik, T. I., Nodari, R. O., & Guerra, M. P. (2019). Comparison of in vitro callus-cultures from transgenic maize AG-5011YG (MON810) and conventional near-isogenic maize AG-5011. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 19(2), 169-175. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332019v19n2a24
Ikeuchi, M., Sugimoto, K., & Iwase, A. (2013). Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. The Plant Cell, 25(9), 3159-3173. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.116053
Ismaili, A., & Mohammadi, P. P. (2016). Effect of genotype, induction medium, carbohydrate source, and polyethylene glycol on embryogenesis in maize (Zea mays L.) anther culture. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 38, 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2085-y
Iwase, A., Mitsuda, N., Koyama, T., Hiratsu, K., Kojima, M., Arai, T., Inoue, Y., Seki, M., Sakakibara, H., Sugimoto, K., & Ohme-Takagi, M. (2011). The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 21(6), 508–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.020
Jiao, P., Ma, R., Qi, Z., Jiang, Z., Liu, S., Qu, J., & Ma, Y. (2020). Optimization of callus induction conditions from immature embryos in maize and plant regeneration. Phyton, 88(3), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2020.07980
Krakowsky, M. D., Lee, M., Garay, L., Woodman-Clikeman, W., Long, M. J., Sharopova, N., & Wang, K. (2006). Quantitative trait loci for callus initiation and totipotency in maize (Zea mays L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 113(5), 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-006-0334-y
Kumar, G., Sreenu, P., Sridevi, M., Reddy, M. K., & Kumar, P. (2018). Coleoptilar node - A season-independent explant source for in vitro culture in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology, 6(3), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.7324/JABB.2018.60304
Leva, A. R., Petruccelli, R., & Rinaldi, L. M. R. (2012). Somaclonal variation in tissue culture: a case study with olive. Recent Advances in Plant in vitro Culture, 7, 123-150. https://doi.org/10.5772/50367
Liliane, T. N., & Charles, M. S. (2020). Factors Affecting Yield of Crops. Agronomy-Climate Change & Food Security, 9. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.90672
Malini, N., Ananadakumar, C. R., & Ramakrishnan, S. H. (2015). Regeneration of Indian maize genotypes (Zea mays L.) from immature embryo culture through callus induction. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 7(1), 131-137. https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v7i1.576
Manivannan, A., Kaul, J., Singode, A., & Dass, S. (2010). Callus induction and regeneration of elite Indian maize inbreds. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9(44), 7446-7452.
Masters, A., Kang, M., McCaw, M., Zobrist, J. D., Gordon-Kamm, W., Jones, T., & Wang, K. (2020). Agrobacterium-mediated immature embryo transformation of recalcitrant maize inbred lines using morphogenic genes. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 156. https://doi.org/10.3791/60782
Morocz, C., Donn, G., Nemeth, J., & Dudits, D. (1990). An improved system to obtain fertile regenerates via maize protoplast isolated from highly embryogenic suspension culture. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 80(6), 721-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00224183
Mostafa, H. H., Wang, H., Song, J., & Li, X. (2020). Effects of genotypes and explants on garlic callus production and endogenous hormones. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61564-4
Muppala, S., Gudlavalleti, P. K., Pagidoju, S., Malireddy, K. R., Puligandla, S. K., & Dasari, P. (2020). Distinctive response of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in vitro with the acceleration of phytohormones. Journal of Plant Biotechnology, 47(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2020.47.1.026
Mushke, R., Yarra, R., & Bulle, M. (2016). Efficient in vitro direct shoot organogenesis from seedling derived split node explants of maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 14(1), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2016.03.001
Olawuyi, O. J., Dalamu, O., & Olowe, O. M. (2019). In vitro regeneration and proliferation of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes through direct organogenesis. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 9(6), 65-73. https://doi.org/10.7176/JNSR/9-6-09
Ombori, O., Gitonga, N. M., & Machuka, J. (2008). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of tropical maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Biotechnology, 7(2), 224-232. https://doi.org/10.3923/biotech.2008.224.232
Pareddy, D. R., & Petolino, J. F. (1990). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature inflorescences of several elite inbreds of maize. Plant Science, 67(2), 211-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9452(90)90245-J
Pathi, K. M., Tula, S., Huda, K. M. K., Srivastava, V. K., & Tuteja, N. (2013). An efficient and rapid regeneration via multiple shoot induction from mature seed derived embryogenic and organogenic callus of Indian maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Signaling & Behavior, 8(10), e25891. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.25891
Pervin, M. M., Azad, M. A. K., Arifuzzaman, M., Rahman, M. A., Shovon, S. R., & Ali, M. K. (2019). Regeneration of Plant through embryo culture from promising maize (Zea mays L.) Inbred Lines. Acta Scientific Agriculture, 3(11), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.31080/ASAG.2019.03.0684
Rufino, C. A., Fernandes-Vieira, J., Martín-Gil, J., Junior, J. S. A., Tavares, L. C., Fernandes-Correa, M., & Martín-Ramos, P. (2018). Water stress influence on the vegetative period yield components of different maize genotypes. Agronomy, 8(8), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/AGRONOMY8080151
Sairam, R. V., Parani, M., Franklin, G., Lifeng, Z., Smith, B., MacDougall, J., & Wilber, C. (2003). Shoot meristem: an ideal explant for Zea mays L. transformation. Genome, 46(2), 323-329. https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-120
Santos, A. O., Nuvunga, J. J., Silva, C. P., Pires, L. P. M., Von Pinho, R. G., Guimarães, L. J. M., & Balestre, M. (2017). Maize hybrid stability in environments under water restriction using mixed models and factor analysis. Genetics and Molecular Research, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.4238/gmr16029672
Saputro, T. B., Dianawati, S., Sholihah, N. F., & Ermavitalini, D. (2017, June). Genetic diversity of improved salt tolerant calli of maize (Zea mays L.) using RAPD. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1854, No. 1, p. 020033). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985424
Tiwari, S., Agrawal, P. K., Pande, V., & Gupta, H. S. (2015). Callus induction and whole plant regeneration in sub-tropical maize (Zea mays L.) using mature embryos as explants. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 75(3), 330-335. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00052.8
Tomes, D. T., & Smith, O. S. (1985). The effect of parental genotype on initiation of embryogenic callus from elite maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 70(5), 505-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00305983
Tuskan, G. A., Mewalal, R., Gunter, L. E., Palla, K. J., Carter, K., Jacobson, D. A., & Muchero, W. (2018). Defining the genetic components of callus formation: A GWAS approach. PloS One, 13(8), e0202519. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202519
Wang, H., Cheng, J., Cheng, Y., & Zhou, X. (2012). Study progress on tissue culture of maize mature embryo. Physics Procedia, 25, 2225-2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.374
Wang, Q. M., & Wang, L. (2012). An evolutionary view of plant tissue culture: somaclonal variation and selection. Plant Cell Reports, 31(9), 1535-1547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-012-1281-5
Willman, M. R., Schroll, S., & Hodges, T. K. (1989). Inheritance of somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from primary (type 1) callus in maize. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 25(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02624417
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2022 Justus Anyieni Obara, Richard Mulwa, Maurice Oyoo, Miriam Karwitha
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.