Estimation of land and manpower needs for year-round supply of green fodder (Super Napier) to dairy cattle through time studies and crop cutting experiments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2024.v8.8800Keywords:
Super Napier, Man-hour, Tillage, Yield of fodderAbstract
The present study was undertaken to determine the land and manpower needed for the production of Super Napier fodder for the year-round feeding of dairy cattle present in Livestock Research Station, Mahanandi, Nandyal district, Andhra Pradesh through time studies and crop cutting experiments. The occasional activities of fodder production such as tillage, planting, irrigation and fertilizer application required 113.97 ± 7.31, 35.81 ± 0.98, 8.45 ± 0.31 and 0.56 ± 0.03 man-hours per acre, respectively, while the daily activities of fodder production such as harvesting of fodder, loading of fodder bundles, transport, chaffing and feeding took 5.64 ± 0.19, 1.86 ± 0.11, 0.24 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.06 and 0.34 ± 0.01 man-hours per ton, respectively. Among the tillage operations, weeding required the most time (105.83 ± 6.90 man-hours per acre) and the application of an adjusted cultivator required the least time (0.64 ± 0.07 man-hours per acre). The cutting of planting material into stem cuttings and the harvesting of the planting material consumed the highest (16.52 ± 0.62 man-hours per acre) and lowest (3.97 ± 0.28 man-hours per acre) time, respectively, among the planting operations. There was a significant difference between two labourers of the same age in the application of adjusted cultivator (P < 0.01) and furrow irrigation (P < 0.05). The mean fresh yield of fodder in the farm was 16.73 ± 1.62 tons per acre per harvest or 100.40 ± 9.72 tons per acre per annum. Based on the results, it was concluded that one acre of cultivable land managed by a single person is sufficient for ensuring the year-round feeding of seven dairy animals under Super Napier fodder production.
Downloads
References
Baliyan, K., & Kumar, S. (2014). Contribution of farm women in household income: Evidence from Western Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Social and Economic Research, 4(3), 302-335. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-6270.2014.01107.6
Birthal, P. S., & Jha, A. K. (2005). Economic losses due to various constraints in dairy production in India. The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 75(12), 1470-1475.
CIAE. (2004). Tractor mounted fodder harvester. Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal.
Getiso, A., & Mijena, D. (2021). Performance Evaluation of Napier Grass (Penisetum Purpuruem (L.) Schumach) accessions under rain fed and Irrigation System at Wondo Genet. Global Journal of Ecology, 6(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.17352/gje.000041
Gupta, R. K., & Joshi, H. C. (2010). Man-power utilization in some unit operations of dairy farm. AMA, Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 41(2), 77-83.
Heitkämper, K., Stehle, T., & Schick, M. (2015). Working time requirement for different field irrigation methods. International Journal of Agricultural Management, 4(2), 50-54.
IGFRI. (2015). Vision 2050. ICAR- Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Mafongoya, P. L., & Jiri, O. (2015). Impact of conservation agriculture on weed dynamics and maize grain yield in eastern Zambia. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(46), 4231-4240. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.8111
Mohamad, S. S. S., Kamaruddin, N. A., & Ting, J. Y. (2022). Study on Chemical Composition of Napier Pak Chong (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum glaucum) Harvested at Different Growth Stages. Journal of Agrobiotechnology, 13(1S), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.37231/jab.2022.13.1S.315
Mynavathi, V. S., Prabhakaran, N. K., & Chinnusamy, C. (2015). Manually-operated weeders for time saving and weed control in irrigated maize. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 47(1), 98-100.
Nandaniya, J. V., Mehta, T. D., & Gaadhe, S. K. (2022). Development and Performance Evaluation of Lucerne Harvesting Machine. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 10(7), 4013-4020. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.45568
NIANP. (2013). Vision 2050. ICAR – National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology, Adugodi, Bengaluru.
Nikam, M. D., Thakare, S. H., Khambalkar, V. P., & Karhale, S. S. (2017). Study of Economics of Manual and Mechanical Harvesting Method of Sorghum Crop. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(6), 1211-1217. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.606.140
Obiri, B. D., Bright, G., Mcdonald, M., Jatango, J. A., Cobbina, J., & Sinclair, F. (2007). The economic potential and farmer perceptions of herbaceous legume fallows in Ghana. Experimental Agriculture, 43(3), 269-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479707005005
Ogwuike, P., Rodenburg, J., Diagne, A., Agboh-Noameshie, A. R., & Amovin-Assagba, E. (2014). Weed management in upland rice in sub-Saharan Africa: impact on labor and crop productivity. Food Security, 6, 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0351-7
Pandey, K. C., & Roy, A. K. (2011). Forage Crops Varieties. ICAR- Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, Uttar Pradesh.
Reddy, T. G. (1970). Farm work studies on problems of labour management on institutional and non-institutional farms. Postgraduate Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University.
Roy, A. K., Agrawal, R. K., Bhardwaj, N. R., Mishra, A. K., & Mahanta, S. K. (2019). Revisiting national forage demand and availability scenario. ICAR- Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi.
Sahay, C. S., Pathak, P. K., Dwivedi, P. N., & Sharma, R. (2015). Tractor drawn fodder harvester for large forage production farms. Indian Farming, 64(6), 29-30.
Sarkar, A., & Dutta, A. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of dairy sector in India vis-à-vis world: A critical review. Exploratory Animal and Medical Research, 10(1), 9-17.
Sathiyabarathi, M., Jeyakumar, S., Manimaran, A., Jayaprakash, G., Kumar, R. D., Chandrasekar, T., Prakash, M. A., Parkunan, T., & Mondal, S. (2015). Dairy Farm Labour Utilization Pattern and Their Welfare. Indian Journal of Dairy and Biosciences, 26, 29-34.
Singh, M. U. (2018). Field Performance Evaluation of Tractor Drawn Tillage Implement Used in Hilly Regions of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Hill Farming, 31(1), 87-94.
Singh, V., & Aalam, R. N. (2017). Performance evaluation of self – propelled fodder cutter bar type harvester for Sudan and Berseem harvesting. International Journal of Science, Environment and Technology, 6(1), 935-945.
Snedecor, G. W., & Cochran, W. G. (1989). Statistical methods. (8th ed.). Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.
Sreedhar, S., & Ranganadham, M. (2009). Time and motion studies on forage farm operations for important fodder crops. Agricultural Science Digest, 29(2), 33-35.
Sushma, H. A., Kumar, M. D., Venkatesha, M. M., & Madapurada, A. (2021). Growth and yield performance of Hybrid Napier and fodder Cowpea intercropping under different planting patterns. Forage Research, 47(1), 105-112.
Triveni, B., Rao, K. A., Teja, A., Kumar, M. R., & Singh, T. V. (2023). Evaluation of Different Fodder Napier Hybrids and their Suitability for Coastal Region of Andhra Pradesh. Biological Forum – An International Journal, 15(6), 643-645.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 M. V. Dharma Rao, B. Nageswara Reddy, P. Pandu Ranga Reddy, G. Sri Manjula Reddy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
.