Community farm school approach for coconut seedlings/juveniles through collaborative social actions

Authors

  • P. Anithakumari ICAR Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Kayamkulam, Kerala
  • S. Indhuja ICAR Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Kayamkulam, Kerala
  • M. Shareefa ICAR Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Kayamkulam, Kerala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2023.v51.i2.8669

Abstract

Three Grama Panchayats in Kerala's Alappuzha district undertook community-level participatory action research in 2019–2021. A total of 90 coconut farmers participated in the adoption of ICAR-CPCRI technology to produce West Coast Tall (WCT) coconut seedlings that are resistant/tolerant to the root (wilt) disease at the community level. Partners included extension agents, coconut producers' societies (CPS) and clusters, women self-help groups (WSHGs), and agricultural labor organizations. The characteristics of technologies that are suggested for adoption in root (wilt) disease-affected tracts, such as the scientific management of young coconut trees and the production of high-quality seedlings through community nurseries, challenge the idea of adoption. There are a lot of variances in the homestead gardens' marginal holdings, including expertise, the use of technology, and access to advisory services. Government agencies provided the majority of the seedlings and extension advisory services, emphasizing the necessity for FPO-based or private extension in the coconut growing industry. The coconut farmers' understanding has significantly improved as a result of the participatory interventions for managing seedlings. The participatory demonstration and community farm school (CFS) strategy is discussed in the paper as a way for homesteads to manage juvenile coconuts while integrating new ideas and fostering cross and reciprocal learning. Refining the current extension approach requires integrating new knowledge about the characteristics of seedling growth, future economic performance, and social evaluation of choices of technological, individual, and skill-oriented interventions in risk-prone areas with debilitating root (wilt) disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anandu, B. 2016. Problems and prospects of coconut marketing in Karnataka state: an economic analysis. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review. 4 (10):12-15

Anithakumari, P. 2008. Clustering coconut farmers – A successful extension approach for enhancing adoption and income from marginal and small holdings. CORD 24 (2): 29-38.

Anithakumari.P., Muralidharan, K and Kalavathy, S. 2012. Technology utilization among coconut farmers of root (wilt) disease affected areas. Journal of Plantation Crops. 40. 174-1799.

Anithakumari, P. 2013. Labour availability in coconut cultivation and impact on technology adoption as perceived by coconut farmers. Journal of Plantation Crops. 41 (2): 186-190.

Anithakumari, P., Muralidharan, K. and Kalavathi,S. 2015. Community extension approach in bio management of rhinoceros beetle, the major pest of coconut. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education. 15 (1): 70 -75.

Banerjee, A. V. 1992. A Simple Model of Herd Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3):797–817. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118364

Batugal, P.A. 1999. The role of international cooperation in the development of biotechnology in coconut. In: Current Advances in Coconut Biotechnology (Oropeza, C. Verdeil, J.L. Ashburner, G.R. Cardena, R. and Samantha, J.M. Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publisher, London. pp. 19–30.

Douthwaite, B.J., Keatinge, D.H., Park, J. 2001. Why promising technologies fail: the neglected role of user innovation during adoption. Research Policy 30 (5),: 819–836

Fiskovica, A.A., Grivins, M., Burton, R.J.F., Elzen, B., Flanigan, S., Frick, R. and Hardy, C. 2021. Disentangling critical success factors and principles of on-farm agricultural demonstration events. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 27(5): 639-656.

Gibson, J. J. 1966. The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin

Guzman, D.L.E., Zamora, O. and Bernardo, D.F. 2015. Diversified and Integrated Farming Systems (DIFS): Philippine Experiences for Improved Livelihood and Nutrition. Journal of Developments in Sustainable Agriculture 10: 19-33.

Hall, A.J., Clark, N.G., Sulaiman, R., Sivamohan, M.V.K. and Yoganand, B. 2000. New agendas for agricultural research in developing countries: Policy analysis and institutional implifications. Knowledge, technology and policy 13(1): 70-91.

Khalfan, N.A. 2015. Adoption of improved technologies in coconut production by smallholder farmers in West district, Zanzibar. Doctoral dissertation, Sokoine University of Agriculture http://www.suaire.sua.ac.tz/ handle/123456789/1048

Kilpatric, S. 2000. Education and Training: Impacts on Farm Management Practice. The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 7 (2): 105–116.

Krishnamurthy, A.T., Sreenatha, A., Jayapalaiah, G.P., and Arun, N. 2010. Extent of adoption of improved cultivation practices in coconut in Chikmagalur district of Karnataka. Agriculture Update 5(3 & 4): 423-426.

Laurens, K. 2022. Advisory support and learning on non-technical aspects of farming: a key topic for extension and education research, The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 28(3): 251-253.

Man, N. and Shah, J.A. 2020. Acceptance of new coconut seed Matag among Coconut growers in Bagan Datoh, Perak and Bachok, Kelantan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10(16): 1–26.

Mendoza, T., Teves, G., Miciano, N., 2018, Value Chain Assessment of Coconut-Intercropping Systems of Smallholders in Southern Mindanao, Philippines: Options for Improvement. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.34634. 88000. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3268 35420.

Muliyar, M.K. 1983.Transfer of technology in plantation crops. Journal of Plantation Crops. 11(1): 1-12

Muyengi, Z., Msuya, E. and Lazaro, E. 2015. Coconut productivity and the status of improved agricultural technologies at small-scale level in Tanzania: Country Experience after National Coconut Development Program. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development 6(18): 100-113.

Muyengi, Z.E. 2017. Evidence Based Decline in Coconut Productivity along the Coastline of Tanzania. Huria Journal 24(2): 122-133.

Report (2022). Division of Horticulture, Ministry of Agriculture Development and Farmers Welfare, GOI, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation. Accessed from https://coconutboard.gov.in/index.aspx

Rodriguez, J. 2014. Rebuilding Better for Coconut Farmers, Post-Haiyan reconstruction in the Philippines, OXFAM I n t e r n a t i o n a l , h t t p s : / / w w w. o x f a m . o r g / s i t e s / www.oxfam.org/files/bn-coconut-livelihoodsphilippines-recovery-120214-en.pdf, Accessed on January 19, 2023. Pp14

Rogers, E. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth edition. Free Press: New York.

Ruales, J. H., Moises, N., Seriño, V., Therese, C. R., Jacob, G. C. and Wendy, C.E. 2020. Investment appraisal of selected climate smart agricultural practices among small scale coconut farmers in Leyte, Philippines. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 20 (3): 499-506.

Saint Ville, A.S., Hickey, G.M., Locker, U. and Phillip, L.E. 2016. Exploring the Role of Social Capital in Influencing Knowledge Flows and Innovation in Smallholder Farming Communities in the Caribbean. Food Security 8 (3): 535–549.

Seguni, Z., Nyange, V., Materu, C., Mwingira, G. and Mruma, B. 2010. Pest Control Research. In Twenty-Five Years of Coconut Research for Development in Tanzania. The handbook prepared by URT. Dar es Salaam. pp. 78-96.

Subhathma, R.W.G. 2018. Analysis of adoption levels of technologies recommended for the management of major coconut pests in Sri Lanka. Journal of Agricultural Science and Food Research 9 (3): 2-5.

Sumberg, J. 2005. Systems of innovation theory and the changing architecture of agricultural research in Africa. Food Policy 30: 21–41.

Thornton, P., Schuetz, T., Wiebke. F., Laura. C., Abreu. D., Vermeulen, S. and Campbell. B.M. 2017. Responding to global change: A theory of change approach to making agricultural research for development outcome-based. Agricultural Systems 152:145-153.

Torabi, N., Cooke, B. and Bekessy, S.A. 2016. The Role of Social Networks and Trusted Peers in Promoting Biodiverse Carbon Plantings. Australian Geographer 47 (2): 139–156.

Wulandari, S. and Alouw, J.C. 2021. Scheme to support coconut replanting program on smallholder plantation. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/892/1/012088.Pp9.

Published

30-11-2023

How to Cite

Anithakumari, P., Indhuja, S., & Shareefa, M. (2023). Community farm school approach for coconut seedlings/juveniles through collaborative social actions. Journal of Plantation Crops, 51(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2023.v51.i2.8669

Issue

Section

Research Articles