Bean and beverage quality - Prospects of four F1 hybrids of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in India

Authors

  • Divya K. Das Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Board, CRS (P.O) - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru Dist., Karnataka, India
  • M.B. Shivanna Department of P. G. Studies and Research in Applied Botany, Jnana Sahyadri, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta-577 451, Karnataka, India
  • N.S. Prakash Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Board, CRS (P.O) - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru Dist., Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2021.v49.i3.7450

Abstract

In coffee, both physical quality attributes as assessed by the colour and size of the beans and cup quality of the beverage rated based on sensory analysis are the important criteria for determining market price. In general, quality is dependent on genotype and also influenced by the growing conditions. The bean and beverage quality of pure C. arabica varieties is far superior to diploid introgressed arabica genotypes developed for improved host resistance. Thus, integrating the host resistance without affecting quality parameters is very imperative in arabica coffee breeding. Four F1 hybrids (S.5083, S.5084, S.5085 & S.5086) developed from reciprocal crosses between the most popular semi-dwarf arabica variety ‘Chandragiri’ and Sln.10, an auto-tetraploid of a diploid inter-specific hybrid, used as a donor for rust resistance, were evaluated for physical quality traits for four seasons and cup profiles for two seasons. Among the four hybrids, S.5085 and S.5086 recorded bold bean size with 70.05 per cent and 69.75 per cent of mean ‘A’ grade beans, respectively. The ‘B’ grade ranged from 9.5 per cent to 10.4 per cent in hybrids as against 16.8 per cent in Chandragiri. The Pea berry ranged from 10.1 per cent to 12.5 per cent, indicating high fertility in hybrids. The cup qualities of S.5085 and S.5086 were also found superior with a cumulative average score of 80.3 and 78.3 respectively, compared to parents; 71.6 in Chandragiri and 77.3 in Sln.10. The present study established the superiority of S.5085 and S.5086 in quality parameters and therefore has potential implications in the commercial exploitation of these two F1 hybrids that also manifested high levels of field tolerance to coffee leaf rust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bertrand, B., Etienne, H. and Cilas C. 2005. Coffea arabica hybrid performance for yield, fertility and bean weight. Euphytica 141: 255-262.

Cheserek, J. J., Ngugu, K., Muthomi, J. W. and Omondi, C. O. 2020. Assessment of Arabusta coffee hybrids [Coffea Arabica L.x Tetraploid robusta (Coffea canephora)] for green bean physical properties and cup quality. African Journal of Food Science 14(5):119-127.

DaMatta, F.M., Avila, R.T., Cardoso, A.A., Martins, S.C.V. and Ramalho, J. C. 2018. Physiological and Agronomic Performance of the Coffee Crop in the Context of Climate Change and Global Warming: A Review. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 66(21):5264-5274.

Geneti, D. 2019. Review on genetic, environment and their interaction (G x E) for stability of coffee quality. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 9(21): 23-28.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical procedure for agricultural research 680 pp. John- Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.

Gonzalez-Rios, Mirna L. Suarez- Quiroz, Boulanger Renaud and Sabine Schorr-Galindo. 2007. Impact of “ecological” post-harvest processing on the volatile fraction of coffee beans: I. Green coffee. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20(3):289-296.

Kathurima, C.W., Gichimu, B.M., Kenji, G.M., Muhoho, S.M. and Boulanger, R. 2009. Evaluation of beverage quality and green bean physical characteristics of selected Arabica coffee genotypes in Kenya, Africa. Journal Food Science 3(11): 365-371.

Leroy,T., Ribeyre, F., Bertrand, B., Charmetant, P., Dufour, M., Montagnon, C., Marraccini, P. and Pot, D. 2006. Genetics of coffee quality. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 18(1):2 29-242.

Lison, M., Cecile, A., Claudine, C., Philippe, C., Melanie B., Luciano N., Valentina L., Bosselman A.S., Nerea, T.G., Alpizar E., Georget, F., Breitler, j., Etienne, H., Bertrand, B. 2020. G X E interactions on yield and quality in Coffea arabica: new F1 hybrids outperform American cultivars. Euphytica 216:78 doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02608-8.

SCAA. “Specialty Coffee Association of America Standards” https://sca.coffee/research/coffee-standards.

Tran, H.T.M., Vargas, C.A.C., Lee, L.S., Slade, Furtado., A., Smyth, H., and Henry, R. 2017.Variation in bean morphology and biochemical composition measured in different genetic groups of arabica coffee (Coffea arabica L.). Tree Genetics and Genomes 13(3):54 doi: https:// doi.org/10.1007/s11295-017-1138-8.

Wintgens, J. N. 2012. Factors influencing the Quality of Green Coffee. In “Coffee: Growing, Processing, Sustainable Production - A Guide book for Growers, Processors, Traders, and Researchers” pp 976 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KCaA. Weinheim, Germany.

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Das, D. K. ., Shivanna, M. ., & Prakash, N. . (2021). Bean and beverage quality - Prospects of four F1 hybrids of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) in India. Journal of Plantation Crops, 49(3), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2021.v49.i3.7450

Issue

Section

Research Articles