Pre-extension demonstration of triticale (Trticusecole wittm. Ex A. Camus) technology at Kamba Zuria District of Gamo Zone, South Ethiopia

Authors

  • Lakamo Liben Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Researcher, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Research Directorate, P.O.BOX: 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  • Anteneh Bulke Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Researcher, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Research Directorate, P.O.BOX: 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  • Melese Ejamo Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Researcher, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Research Directorate, P.O.BOX: 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
  • Abebaw Bergena Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Researcher, South Ethiopia Agricultural Research Institute, Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center, Agricultural Technology Transfer and Communication Research Directorate, P.O.BOX: 2228, Arba Minch, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9749

Keywords:

Benefit cost ratio, Dersolign, Farmers preference, Grain yield, Kamba Zuria, Triticale technology

Abstract

Although most of the Gamo Zone has indigenous varieties of triticale, farmers use it extensively, yet produce very little. The Dersolign variety demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the adaptation trial of the 5 triticale varieties carried out by Arba Minch Agricultural Research Center to address this issue. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the costs, preferences, and acceptance of triticale technology in the context of farmers during the 2024 Meher cropping season. Kamba Zuria district was purposively selected based on the potential of the crop, and 2 Kebeles were selected purposively based on the potential of the crop. For the study, 2 Farmers Training Centers (FTCs) and 30 farmers were purposively selected. The researchers trained farmers and other stakeholders. 30 farmers’ fields and 2 FTCs at 200 m2 sections of nearby fields were used to demonstrate Dersolign and the local check. Seed rates of 150 kg ha-1 and 100 kg ha-1 NPS, 50 kg ha-1 of UREA, and 20 cm between rows were used. Every field received the same application of all recommended agronomic techniques, and the fields were properly managed and regularly checked. Agronomic and social data were gathered through measurements and Focus Group Discussions, respectively. The yield, income, and cost data that were gathered were subjected to mean, percentage, and qualitative analysis. The Dersolign type produced the maximum grain yields from farmers’ fields (4,326 kg ha-1) and FTC (4,048 kg ha-1), respectively. Additionally, the t-test result indicated that Dersolign and the local check differ statistically significantly at a 0.05% probability level. According to the results of the Costs and Benefits analysis, farmers that produce Dersolign rather than the local check might profit an extra 46,710 ETB ha-1 on average. Thus, the Dersolign variety’s seeds should be widely multiplied by the Arba Minch Agricultural Research Centers’ seed multiplication department, and the Kamba Zuria district Agricultural extension section should provide a full package by participating stakeholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bednarz, L. (2018). Fremdheit Und Heimat In Stadt Und Land: Uber Gemeinsamkeiten Und Unterschiede [Foreignness and belonging in city and country: On similarities and differences]. Indes, 7(4), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.13109/inde.2018.7.4.56

CIMMYT. (2004). Second Semi-Annual Progress Report for the QPM Development Project for the Horn and East Africa. Mexico: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.

de Boef, W. S., & Thijssen, M. H. (2007). Participatory tools working with crops, varieties and seeds: A guide for professionals applying participatory approaches in agrobiodiversity management, crop improvement and seed sector development. Centre for Development Innovation.

Drury, C. (2006). Cost and Management Accounting. (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Boston Irwin McGraw-Hill.

Emerick, K., & Dar, M. H. (2020). Farmer Field Days and Demonstrator Selection for Increasing Technology Adoption. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 103(4), 680-693. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00917

FAO. (2004). Triticale improvement and production. In M. Mergoum & H. Gómez-Macpherson (Eds.), FAO Plant production and protection paper Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Gedamu-Gobena, A. (2008). Triticale Production in Ethiopia: Its Impact on Food Security and Poverty Alleviation in the Amhara Region. Kassel, Germany: Kassel University press GmbH.

Gerema, G., Mamo, K., Birhanu, C., Debela, M., Dessalegn, K., Chemeda, G., Kebede, M., Gudisa, B., Feyisa, H., Mangistu, G., Lule, D., & Bedada, G. (2020). Registration of a New Triticale Variety: ‘Kombolcha’. East African Journal of Sciences, 14(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.4314/eajsci.v14i2

Gobeze, L., Legese, H., & Daniel, M. (2007). Effect of Land Preparation Methods and Spacing in Growth and Yield of Cassava Plant Production and Protection paper 179. Proceedings of African Society of Crop Sciences, 68-72.

Habremariam, A. (2014). Communication Protocol and Effective Program Planning of Agricultural Extension and Production Packages. Addis Ababa, Ethopia: Ethiopian Agricultural Transformation Agency.

Jessop, R. S., & Wright, R. L. (1991). New crops: Agronomy and potential of alternative crop species. Australia: Inkata Press.

Legesse, W. (2017). Fast Truck Variety Development and Participatory Variety Selection Approach for Climate Smart Agriculture in Shebel Berenta District, Eastern Gojam, Ethiopia. International Journal of Current Research, 9(5), 50179-50183.

Meng, E. C. H. (2009). Economic Analysis of Diversity in Modern Wheat. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429061646

Myer, R. O. (2002). Triticale Grain in Young Pig Diets. Proceedings of the Fifth International Triticale Symposium. Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute.

Peña, R. J. (2004). Food Uses of Triticale. In M. Mergoum & H. Gómez-Macpherson (Eds.), FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 179: Triticale Improvement and Production (pp. 37-48) Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Teklay, Z. T. Y. (2015). Demonstration of improved bread and durum wheat varieties in South Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 10, 122-127.

Published

08-12-2025

How to Cite

Liben, L., Bulke, A. ., Ejamo, M., & Bergena, A. (2025). Pre-extension demonstration of triticale (Trticusecole wittm. Ex A. Camus) technology at Kamba Zuria District of Gamo Zone, South Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Agriculture, 9, 260–265. https://doi.org/10.25081/jsa.2025.v9.9749

Issue

Section

Articles