Effect of different crop management practices for better economic returns from Kharif onion

Effects of NPKS fertilizer levels and spacing on Kharif onion

Authors

  • R L Bhardwaj Agricultural Research Sub-station, Sumerpur-Pali, Rajasthan 306 902
  • D K Parmar Agricultural Research Sub-station, Sumerpur-Pali, Rajasthan 306 902
  • Jaideep Meena Agricultural Research Sub-station, Sumerpur-Pali, Rajasthan 306 902
  • Latika Vyas Directorate of Extension Education, MPUAT Udaipur, Rajasthan 313 001

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/josac.2022.v31.i1.7737

Keywords:

Allium cepa, bolting, crop geometry, nutrient, polar diameter, productivity, split bulb

Abstract

The present study was undertaken at the Agricultural Research Substation, Sumerpur-Pali to find out the effect of different fertilizer levels and crop geometry on kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) production. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with NPKS levels as main plot and crop geometry as subplot with three replications. Spacious crop geometry with highest dose of fertilizer (15 cm x 15 cm + 140 N: 80 P: 80 K: 40 S kg ha-1) produced maximum plant height (98.20 cm), leaves plant-1 (20), bulb polar diameter (79.34 mm), equatorial diameter (85.10 mm), bulb weight (137.44 g) and harvest index (51.30) with huge quantity of split/multiplier bulbs (6.54 t ha-1). Marketable yield (43.71 t ha-1), gross return (` 5.25 lakhs), net return (` 4.25 lakhs) and B: C ratio (4.25) were higher in the closer crop geometry (10 cm x 10 cm) with highest dose of fertilizer, whereas maximum biological yield (126.75 t ha-1) and total bulb yield (61.60 t ha-1) were reported in the closest spacing with highest dose of fertilizer (7.5 cm x 7.5 cm + 140 N: 80 P: 80 K: 40 S kg ha-1), which also produced the highest quantity (28.69 t ha-1) of unmarketable bulbs. It is concluded that for maximum production of better quality of kharif onion bulb, the seedlings should be planted at 10 cm x 10 cm spacing with the highest level of fertilizer dose (140 N: 80 P: 80 K: 40 S kg ha-1).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdissa Yohannes, Tekalign Tsegaw & Pant L M 2011 Growth, bulb yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) as influenced by nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on vertisol I. growth attributes biomass production and bulb yield. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6(14): 3252–3258.

Aliyu U, Dikko A U, Magaji M D & Singh A 2008 Nitrogen and intra row spacing effects on growth and yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Plant Sci. 3(3): 188–193.

Aliyu U, Manga M D, Yakubu A I & Dikko A U 2007 Correlation and path coefficient analysis for some yield related traits in onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Plant Sci. 2(3): 366–369.

Amare G, Mohammed W & Tana T 2020 Effect of plant spacing and NP fertilizer levels on growth, seed yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) at Shewa Robit, Northern Ethiopia. Open Bio. technol. J. 14: 12–22.

Amin M R, Hasan M K, Naher Q, Hossain M A & Noor Z U 2007 Response of onion to NPKS fertilizers in low ganges flood plain soil. Intl. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2:11–14.

Anonymous 2021 Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA). https://apeda.gov.in/ apedawebsite/SubHead_Products/Onions. htm.

Awas G, Abdisa T, Tolesa K & Chali A 2010 Effect of intra-row spacing on yield of three onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties at Adami Tulu agricultural research centre (mid rift valley of Ethiopia). J. Hortic. For. 2(1): 7–11.

Barman H K, Siddiqui M N, Siddique M A, Roni M S & Nuruzzaman M 2013 Combined effect of organic manure and potassium on growth and yield of onion cv. Bari piaz-i. Int. J. Agric. Res. Innov. Tech. 3(1): 47–51.

Boyhan G, Granberry D & Kelley T 2001 Onion production guide, extension bulletin, university of Georgia, college of agricultural and environmental sciences, USA. 54p.

Brewster J L 2008 Onions and other vegetable alliums, 2nd Ed. CABI, Oxfordshire, UK.

Dawar N M, Wazir F K, Dawar M & Dawar S H 2007 Effect of planting density on growth and yield of onion varieties under climatic conditions of Peshawar. Sarhad J. Agric. 23(4): 912–917.

E l Desuki M, Mahmoud A R & Hafiz M M 2006 Response of onion plants to minerals and bio-fertilizers application. Res. J. Agric. & Biol. Sci. 2(6): 292–298.

Gebretsadik K & Dechassa N 2016 Effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates and intra row spacing on bulb yield of onion (Allium cepa L.) at Shire, Northern Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Res. 5 (10): 1769–1773.

Godara A S & Mehta R S 2013 Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to crop geometry and nitrogen levels. Prog. Hort. 45(1): 214–217.

Hannaalla M H, E l Kafoury A K, Ibrahim M Y & E l-Gammal M M 1991 Effect of nitrogen fertilizer levels on bulb yield and quality of some onion cultivars. Minufiya J. Agric. Res. 16(2): 1637–1644.

Harris K D, Suthaharan S & Geretharan T 2016 Effect of spacing and levels of nitrogen on growth and bulb yield of red onion (Allium cepa var. Ascalonicum). IJARR. 1(3): 39–50.

Islam M A, Sharnsuddoha A T M, Bhuiyan M S I & Hasanmzaman M 2008 Response of summer onion to potash and its application methods. American Eurasian J. Agron. 1(1): 10–15.

Islam M R, Mukherjee A, Quddus K G, Sardar P K & Hossain M 2015 Effect of spacing and fertilizer on the growth and yield of onion. Int. J. Sci. Technol. 4 (10): 308–312.

Jilani A M S, Khaliq G & Waseem K 2003 Effect of different NPK levels on the growth and yield of three onion (Allium cepa L.) varieties. Asian J. Plant Sci. 2(3): 342–346.

Jilani M S, Ahmed P, Waseem K & Kiran M 2010 Effect of plant spacing on growth and yield of two varieties of onion (Allium Cepa L.) under the agro- climatic condition of d. i. khan. Pak. J. Sci. 62(1): 37–41.

Jilani M S, Khan M Q & Saifur Rahman 2009 Planting densities effect on yield and components of onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Agri. Res. 47(4): 397- 404.

Khalil R M, Midan A A & Abu Grab O S 1988 Adaptation of some onion cultivars under middle delta conditions in relation to nitrogen fertilization. II- Bulbs yield, quality and storageability. Minufiya J. Agric. Res. 13(1): 179–194.

Kumara B R, Mansur C P, Girish Chander, Wani S P, Allolli T B, Jagadeesh S L, Mesta R K, Satish D, Shankar Meti & Sanjeevraddi G Reddy 2018 Effect of potassium levels, sources and time of application on yield of onion (Allium cepa L.). Int. J. Pure App. Bio. sci. 6 (2): 540– 549.

Lee J, Moon J, Kim H, Ha I & Lee S 2011 Reduced nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rates for intermediate-day onion in paddy soil with incorporated rice straw plus manure. Hort. Science. 46(3): 470–474.

Mahala P, Jaidka M, Sharma M & Brar NS 2019 Effect of crop geometry on growth and yield of kharif onion. J. Krishi Vigyan 7 (2): 267–269.

Mandal J, Acharyya P, Bera R & Mohanta S 2020 Response of onion to NPKS and micronutrients. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 9 (06): 1137–1144.

Mazumder N I, Sultana T, Paul P C & Noor M M A 2019 Influence of NPK fertilizer and spacing on growth parameters of onion (Allium cepa L. var. BARI piaz-1). Res. Agric. Livest. Fish. 6(1): 19–25.

Meher R, Mandal J, Saha D & Mohanta S. 2016 Effect of sulphur application in onion (Allium cepa L.). J. Crop Weed 12(3): 86–90.

Mondal S G, Ghosh K & Mandal J 2020 Effect of graded levels of sulphur as magnesium sulphate on yield and quality of onion (Allium cepa L.) in red and lateritic soils of West Bengal, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 9(4): 1–9.

Ngullie R & Biswas P K 2017 Effect of plant and row spacing on growth and yield of onion under Mokokchung district of Nagaland. Internat. J. Plant Sci. 12 (1): 28–35.

Pachauri S P, Singh V & Pachauri C P 2005 Effect of FYM, nitrogen and potassium on growth, yield and quality of onion. Ann. Pl. Soil Res. 7(1): 54–56.

Resende G M & Costa N D 2014 Effects of levels of potassium and nitrogen on yields and post-harvest conservation of onions in winter. Rev. Ceres, Vicosa. 61(4): 572–577.

Saud S, Yajun C, Razaq M, Luqman M, Shah fahad, Abdullah M & Sadiq A 2013 Effect of potash levels and row spacings on onion yield. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 3(16): 118–127.

Sharma A, Panja P & Mandal J 2017 Effect of integrated nutrient management on onion (Allium cepa L.) yield, quality attributes, soil properties and production economics under field condition. Indian J. Ecol 44 (Special Issue-5): 355–359.

Singh S P & Verma A B 2001 Response of onion (Allium cepa L.) to potassium application. Indian J. Agron. 46(1): 182–185.

Walle T, Dechassa N & Kebede W T 2018 Yield and yield components of onion (Allium cepa var. cepa) cultivars as influenced by population density at Bir Sheleko, North-Western Ethiopia. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res. 6(3): 172–192.

Published

19-07-2022

How to Cite

Bhardwaj, R. L., Parmar, D. K., Meena, J., & Vyas, L. . (2022). Effect of different crop management practices for better economic returns from Kharif onion: Effects of NPKS fertilizer levels and spacing on Kharif onion. Journal of Spices and Aromatic Crops, 31(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.25081/josac.2022.v31.i1.7737