Robust non-parametric spatial regression and its application in field data analysis

Authors

  • C.T. Jose ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Vittal, Karnataka, India
  • K.P. Chandran ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod-671 121, Kerala, India
  • K. Muralidharan ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod-671 121, Kerala, India
  • D. Jaganathan ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Regional Station, Vittal, Karnataka, India
  • S. Jayasekhar ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod-671 121, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2021.v49.i3.7455

Abstract

Outlier detection and robust estimation are an integral part of data mining and has attracted much attention recently. Generally, the data contain abnormal or extreme values either due to the characteristics of the individual or due to errors in tabulation/data entry. The presence of outliers will severely affect the data modelling and analysis. A robust nonparametric method is proposed to fit the spatial/surface regression that is not influenced by the presence of outliers in the data. Robust M-kernel weighted local linear regression smoother was used to fit the spatial regression function. The proposed method is useful to estimate/eliminate the spatial effect and identify the high potential trees in an orchard, which is useful for breeding programs. The method is illustrated through simulated data. The comparison of AMSE corresponding to the optimum bandwidth shows that the non-robust Kernel Weighted Local Regression Estimator (KWLRE) performs very badly in the presence of outliers. Among the robust estimators, the robust spatial smoother with biweight robustness weight function performed better than the Huber and Hampel weight functions. Comparison of AMSE corresponding to the optimum bandwidth showed that there is not much difference between different types of robustness weight function in the absence of outliers. In the case of robust spatial smoother with biweight per cent robustness weight function, the AMSE for 0 per cent, 4 per cent and 8 per cent outliers are almost the same, indicating that the method is robust against the outliers. The method was also applied to the annual yield data of 225 coconut palms in a field to eliminate spatial effect and to identify the high potential trees. It was found that by removing spatial effects and outliers, the MSE has reduced more than 50 per cent.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cleveland, W.S. and Devlin. S.J. 1988. Locally-Weighted Regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association 83(403): 596-610.

Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. A. 1986. Robust Statistics-The Approach Based on Influence Functions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Hastie, T.J. and Tibshirani, R.J. 1990. Generalized Additive Models. London:Chapman & Hall, London.

Huber, P. J. 1981. Robust Statistics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Jose, C.T. and Ismail, B. 2001. Nonparametric inference on jump regression surface. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics 13: 791-813.

Leung, D. 2005. Cross-validation in nonparametric regression with outliers. The Annals of Statistics 33: 2291-2310.

Rey, W.J.J. 1983. Introduction to Robust and Quasi-robust Statistical Methods. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Ruppert, D. and Wand, M.P. 1994. Multivariate locally weighted least squares regression. Annals of Statistics 22: 1346-1370.

Tukey, J. W. 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

Wang, F.T. and Scott, D.W. 1994. The L1 method for robust nonparametric regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 65-76.

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Jose, C. ., Chandran, K. ., Muralidharan, K. ., Jaganathan, D. ., & Jayasekhar, S. . (2021). Robust non-parametric spatial regression and its application in field data analysis. Journal of Plantation Crops, 49(3), 214–221. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2021.v49.i3.7455

Issue

Section

Methodology Article