Spatiotemporal impact on yield stability of intercropped cocoa (Thoebroma cocoa L.) in cyclone prone Indian East Coastal terrains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2025.v53.i2.9878Abstract
Cocoa (The cocoa) is cross pollinated, perennial and promising inter crop in coconut garden six types viz., VTLCH 1-4, VTLCC1 and VTLC- 1 was received from Regional Station working under ICAR-CPCRI, Vittal and planted at Coconut Research Station, Veppankulam in 2008. Single row system of cocoa was inter-cropped in coconut variety ECT. Thirteen critical biometric and yield related parameters were recorded. As per the AICRP trial for bio metric parameters the data for the year 2022- 23 was analysed and descriptive statistics was discussed. The yield of past four years i.e yield after GAJA cyclone was taken into consideration to analyse the stability of cocoa varieties and to identify superior types suitable for the East coast Tall. Among the various types, the genotypes Tc2 (VTLCH 1), highest mean yield (1.58 kg tree⁻¹ year⁻¹), compared to the lowest in Tc6 (0.96 kg tree⁻¹ year⁻¹). Descriptive statistics indicated moderate variability (CV = 17.72%) for yield. Stability analysis using parametric models showed that Tc2 possessed a regression coefficient less than unity (βᵢ = 0.55), low deviation from regression (S²dᵢ = 0.80), and low coefficient of variation (2.03%), indicating high adaptability under stress conditions. Variance-based parameters further supported its stability, with low θᵢ (19.78), Wᵢ² (24.66), and σ²ᵢ (2.81), coupled with high θ₍ᵢ₎ (30.32), reflecting minimal genotype × environment interaction. Non-parametric stability measures (S and NP indices) and Kang’s rank-sum method also ranked Tc2 as the most stable genotype. Positive correlations between yield and traits such as canopy spread, trunk girth, and pod characteristics emphasized their role in stress recovery and productivity. Overall, Tc2 demonstrated superior yield stability and resilience, making it a suitable genotype for cultivation in cyclone-prone coastal ecosystems and a valuable candidate for climate-resilient breeding programs.
Downloads
References
Apshara, S.E., 2017. Comparative study on clonal and seedling progenies of selected cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) genotypes. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 74(2):168-172.
Arzani, A. 2008. Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants. A biotechnological view. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology Plant 44(5): 373-383
Avendano-Arrazate, C.H., Martinez-Bolanos, M., Reyes-Reyes, A.L., Aragon-Magadan, M.A., Reyes-Lopez, D. and Lopez-Morales, F., 2025. Genotype-environment interaction of genotypes of cocoa in Mexico. Scientific Reports, 15(1):15399.
De Almeida, A-A.F. and Valle. R.R. 2007. Ecophysiology of the cacao tree. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19: 426−448. DOI:10.1590/S1677-042020070004000 11
Efron, Y., Epaina, P., Tade, E., and Marfu, J. (2005). The relationship between vigour, yield and yield efficiency of cocoa clones planted at different densities. In F. Bekele, M. J. End, and A. B. Eskes (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Cocoa Breeding for Improved Production Systems, Accra, Ghana, 19th–21st October 2003 (pp. 92–102).
Fasahat P, RajabiA andS.B.Mahmoudi. 2015. An overview on the use of stability parameters in plant breeding. Biometrics and Biostatistics International Journal, 2(5):149-159. DOI: 10.15406/bbij.2015.02.00043
Finlay, K. W. and Wilkinson G.N.. 1963. Adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/41.3.552
Huhn, M. 1990. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: Theory. Euphytica 47: 189–194.
Kang, M. S. 1988. A rank‐sum method for selecting high‐yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communication 16: 113–115.
Kireeti, A., Ramanandam, G., Rao, V.G., Neeraja, B., Rao, N.C., Apshara, E., Sumitha, S. and Jerard, A.B., 2026. Stability analysis of cocoa clones for yield in the humid tropics of India. Frontiers in Plant Science, 17:1767516.
Lahive, F., Hadley, P. and Daymond, A.J., 2019. The physiological responses of cacao to the environment and the implications for climate change resilience. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39(1):5.
Martínez-Pinilla, E., Oñatibia-Astibia, A. and R. Franco. 2015. The relevance of theobromine for the beneficial effects of cocoa consumption. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 6:30. DOI: 10.3389/ fphar.2015.00030.
Minimol, J.S., Suma, B., Ummer, M., and Chithira, P.G. 2016. Genetic improvement of cocoa by developing superior hybrids. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 53(2): 157-165
Nassar, R. and M. Huhn. 1987. Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics 43: 45–53.
Ofori, A., Padi, F.K., Acheampong, K. and Lowor, S., 2015. Genetic variation and relationship of traits related to drought tolerance in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) under shade and no-shade conditions in Ghana. Euphytica, 201(3):411-421.
Oyekale, A.S., Bolaji, M.B. and O.W. Olawa. 2009. The effects of climate change on cocoa production and vulnerability assessment in Nigeria. Agriculture Journal, 4: 77−85.
Phukon, R.M., Nath, J.C., Sumitha, S., Maheswarappa, H.P. and Elian Apshara. 2021. Early evaluation of cocoa clones as intercrop in coconut gardens under red river region of Assam state, Journal of Plantation Crops, 49(2):77-82
Phuoc, P.H.D. 2009. Cocoa cultivated technique in Vietnam. Vietnam Agriculture Publisher, 3: 1-46.
Plaisted, R. I. and Peterson, L.C.. 1959. A technique for evaluating the ability of selection to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal, 36: 381–385.
Pinto, L.R.M., Silva, S.D.V. and Yamada, M.M., 2007. Evaluation of phenotypic stability of resistance to Phytophthora spp. in cacao clones. Fitopatologia Brasileira, 32:453-457.
Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Yousefian M., Moradkhani H., Poczai P., and K. H. M. Siddique. 2019. STABILITYSOFT: A new online program to calculate parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for crop traits. Applications in Plant Sciences 7(1): e1211. doi:10.1002/aps3.1211
Reddy, I.C and C. Prabahar. 2022. Evading Cyclonic Risks in Perennial Crops Dominated Farm Belt-An Alternative Strategy. Research Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13(4): 1185–1190.
Sajeevkumar, S.S., Minimol, J.S., Ajmal, P.M. and B.Suma. 2017. Diversity analysis of KAU released cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) varieties based on morphological parameters. Journal of Tropical Agriculture 55(1): 81-86.
Schroth, G., Läderach, P., Martinez-Valle, A.I., Bunn, C. and L. Jassogne. 2016. Vulnerability to climate change of cocoa in West Africa: Patterns, opportunities and limits to adaptation. Science of the Total Environment, 556:231−241. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.024
Schwenk, K. and Wagner, G.P. 2001. Function and the Evolution of Phenotypic Stability: Connecting Pattern to Process. American Zoologist, 41(3): 552-563.
Shukla, G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29:238-245. doi:10.1038/hdy.1972.87.
Sumitha, Balakrishnan. SS, Shoba .N, Kumar. M, Jeyakumar . P and V. Jegadeeswari. 2018. Growth and yield performance of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) varieties under Tamil Nadu condition. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2018; 7(5): 591-594
Teixeira, P.J.P.L., Thomazella, D.P.T. and Pereira. G.A.G. 2015. Time for chocolate: Current understanding and new perspectives on cacao witches’ broom disease research. PLoS Pathogens 11. e1005130. DOI: 10.1371/ journal.ppat.1005130
Thennarasu, K. 1995. On certain non‐parametric procedures for studying genotype‐environment interactions and yield stability. PhD thesis, PJ School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Thondaiman, V., Rajamani, K., Senthil, N., Shoba, N. and A.J.Joel. 2013.Variability studies and identification of high yielding plus trees of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) in Tamil Nadu. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 8(26):3444-3453.
Tigchelaar M., Battisti, D.S., Naylor, R.L. and D.K.Ray. 2018 Future warming increases probability of globally synchronized maize production shocks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of U S A, 115(26):6644–6649 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1718031115
Urruty, N., Tailliez-Lefebvre, D and C. Huyghe. 2016. Stability, robustness, vulnerability and resilience of agricultural systems. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 36(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0347-5
Vaezi, B., Pour‐Aboughadareh A., Mehraban A., Hossein‐Pour T., Mohammadi R., Armion M. and M. Dorri. 2018. The use of parametric and non‐parametric measures for selecting stable and adapted barley lines. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 64: 597–611.
Vithya, K., Senthilkumar, B. Jagadeeswari, V. and P. Jayakumar. 2018. Evaluation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) genotypes for pod and bean characters. Journal of Plantation Crops, 46(3): 169-172
Wood, G. A. R. and Lass R.A. 1985. Cocoa. Longman Group Limited, Longman House, New York. Pages 610
Wricke, G. 1962. To calculate the covalency of spring wheat and oats. Plant Breeding 52:127-138.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Plantation Crops
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.