Post-harvest evaluation of Arabica and Robusta coffee for physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties

Authors

  • B.B. Channabasamma Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station Post - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru District Karnataka, India
  • T.N. Sandeep Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station Post - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru District Karnataka, India
  • T.N. Gopinandhan Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station Post - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru District Karnataka, India
  • J.S. Nagaraja Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station Post - 577 117, Chikkamagaluru District Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2022.v50.i3.8233

Abstract

Knowledge about physicomechanical and aerodynamic properties is indispensable for any crop that undergoes post-harvest processing; coffee is no exception. These properties are the most crucial parameters for designing and developing processing machinery and storage structure. As far as coffee is concerned, these properties are imperative for designing dryers, hullers, peeler-cum-polisher and size graders. Though coffee is one of the leading plantation crops in India, published reports on physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties are rather limited. In this direction, a study was attempted to generate data in respect of physical (length, width, thickness, volume, surface area, thousand seed weight, bulk density, true density and porosity), mechanical (angle of repose and co-efficient of friction) and aerodynamic (terminal velocity) property in different coffee types (parchment, cherry and clean coffees of both Arabica and Robusta varieties). At the prescribed moisture content of 11 per cent, the length, width, thickness, volume and surface area were significantly higher (p=0.05) in cherry coffee, followed by parchment and clean coffees. The porosity, bulk density and true density were found in the order of 45 to 58 per cent, 395 to 466 kg m-3 and 856 to 944 kg m-3 for cherry, 56 to 57 per cent, 400 to 410 kg m-3, 950 to 966 kg m-3 for parchment and 37.5 to 44 per cent, 691 to 780 kg m-3 and 1,106 to 1,401 kg m-3 for clean coffee, respectively. There were no significant differences between coffee types in respect of angle of repose, co-efficient of friction and terminal velocity. The data generated under this study can be harnessed while configuring or improving the coffee processing machinery and helps achieve the final product with desirable quality characteristics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. H. R. O., Ching, P. E. and Lim, T. H. 2011. Some physical properties of parkia speciosa seeds. International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology. IPCBEE IACSIT Press 9: 43-47.

Afonso, J.P.C., Correa, P.C., Pinto, F. A. C. and Queiroz, D.M. 2007. Aerodynamic properties of coffee cherries and beans. Biosystem Engineering 98(1): 39-46.

Aleida, J., Sandoval, José., Barreiro, A., Andrea De Sousa., Danny Valera and Alejandro Müller, J. 2019. Determination of the physical properties of fermented and dried Venezuelan Trinitrio cocoa beans (Theobroma cacao L.). Revista Técnica de la Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad del Zulia 42(2): 50-56.

Alonge, A.F. and Adetunji W.B. 2011. Properties of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) relevant to its dehusking. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A1:1089-1094.

Anonymous. 2014. Coffee guide: A manual of coffee cultivation published by Central Coffee Research Institute, Coffee Research Station, Government of India, Chikkamagalur district, Karnataka, India.

Anonymous, 2021. Database on Coffee. Coffee Board of India. https:// www.indiacoffee.org/ database-coffee.html.

Aware, V.V., Nalawade, S. M., Powar, A.G., Chaudhari, N. C. and Jadhav, S. K. 2007. Determination of physical and mechanical properties of cashew nut. The Cashew 21(3): 6-12.

Chandrasekar, V. and Viswanathan, R. 1999. Physical and thermal properties of coffee. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 73(3): 227-234.

Davis, R. M. 2012. Physical and mechanical properties of palm fruit, kernel and nut. Journal of Agricultural Technology 8(7): 2147-2156.

Findik, F., Yilmaz, R. and Koksal, T. 2004. Investigation of mechanical and physical properties of several industrial rubbers. Materials and Design 25: 269-276.

Kaleemullah, S. and John Gunasekar, J. 2002. Moisture-dependent physical properties of arecanut kernels. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 82(3): 331-338.

Kuala, S.I., Hidayat, D.D., Anggara, C.E.W. and Saparita, R. 2018. Characterization and evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of unhulled arabica coffee bean. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 251: 1-8.

Maduako, J. N. and Hamman, M. 2004. Determination of some physical properties of three groundnut varieties. Nigerian Journal of Technology 24(2): 12-18.

Mikru, T., Solomon, A. and Abrar. 2019. Some engineering physical properties of beans of selected cultivars of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown in southwest Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 10: 10299-10307.

Mohsenin, N.N. 1986. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials: Structure, Physical Characteristics and Mechanical Properties. Second Ed. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, 808 p.

Nisha, C. and Amarjeet, K. 2017. Studies on physical and engineering characteristics of maize, pearl millet and soybean. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 6(6): 01-05.

Rathinakumari, A. C., Channabasamma, B. B. and Kumaran, G. S. 2015. Physical and mechanical properties of garlic bulbs and cloves (Allium sativum L.) relevant to development of garlic bulb breaker. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 33(2):1881-1887.

Tabatabaeefar, A. and Rajabipour, A. 2005. Modeling the mass of apples by geometrical attributes. Scientia Horticulturae 105: 373-382.

Vengaiah, P. C., Kaleemullah, S., Madhava, M., Mani, A. and Sreekanth, B. 2021. Some physical properties of palmyrah palm (Borassus flabellifer L.) fruits. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 40(24): 18-25.

Published

30-12-2022

How to Cite

Channabasamma, B., Sandeep, T. ., Gopinandhan, T., & Nagaraja, J. (2022). Post-harvest evaluation of Arabica and Robusta coffee for physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties. Journal of Plantation Crops, 50(3), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2022.v50.i3.8233

Issue

Section

Research Articles